I've heard the comments about O'Neill being given too much power before. Genuine question, does Emery have too much power now? I accept the relative merits of their ability will no doubt come up but I'm more interested in whether Emery were to jump ship for any reason, just how damaging would it be?
Quote from: Meanwood Villa on June 19, 2024, 12:37:07 PMI've heard the comments about O'Neill being given too much power before. Genuine question, does Emery have too much power now? I accept the relative merits of their ability will no doubt come up but I'm more interested in whether Emery were to jump ship for any reason, just how damaging would it be?Very. We're fucked (again) when he goes. But hopefully we'll have finished top two and have a full summer to recover.
I think when you compare what the current owners are doing against the Lerner years and the knowledge of how they turned out, it makes Lerner seem like an amateur. His legacy is the Holte Pub.
I like the way Brighton do things. They have a set way of playing for the club through to academy & any new manager has to have the skillset to be able to slot in & continue the work they have been doing for years. And then when youngsters cone through, they are already used to playing the same way as the first team so the transition isn't so difficult. If we did that with our owners, our first team, our academy, etc, but with higher calibre managers than Brighton, then our growth could be a lot more sustainable...
Phil Mepham? Who he?
I read and agreed with something here about Lerner, for years we needed a very rich owner but the moment we got one it wasn’t enough anymore. Other clubs got the wealth of whole countries.
I thinly liken the Lerner years as an owner to the Bruce years as a manager.We were in deep sh!t when they came in and, basically, saved us.In both cases we were probably in a better position when they left, but we were glad to see the back of them.