FFP

[Dogtanian]

The reason a lot of clubs will have voted down the loss increase is because, believe it or not, people don't want to endlessly pour money into a club just to stay where they are.

At the minute, if the maximum loss is £30m a year, you know that this is the potential bill you foot to play in the Premier League. And all the clubs are in the same boat.

If you vote to let clubs lose £40m a year, then you know you are probably going to be outspent and will also have to up your spending just to be in the same place you are now.

If you are Brentford or Ipswich or Luton, and success to you is staying in the Premier League, do you really want to vote to make that £10m a year more expensive?

[Hookeysmith]

The reason a lot of clubs will have voted down the loss increase is because, believe it or not, people don't want to endlessly pour money into a club just to stay where they are.

At the minute, if the maximum loss is £30m a year, you know that this is the potential bill you foot to play in the Premier League. And all the clubs are in the same boat.

If you vote to let clubs lose £40m a year, then you know you are probably going to be outspent and will also have to up your spending just to be in the same place you are now.

If you are Brentford or Ipswich or Luton, and success to you is staying in the Premier League, do you really want to vote to make that £10m a year more expensive?

But it is not mandatory to spend £30 - £40 million. It does however allow the clubs that are well run and have big backers to spend what they can afford

[Dogtanian]

Allowing those clubs to overtake the clubs who don't want to spend the money...

[Percy McCarthy]

It obviously put us at odds with the clubs above us, and with those below as well, for the reasons stated above. The vote was more brutal than the Tory election result.

[AV82EC]

It obviously put us at odds with the clubs above us, and with those below as well, for the reasons stated above. The vote was more brutal than the Tory election result.

Yep think it was only us and C115y who voted for it.

[LeeB]

It obviously put us at odds with the clubs above us, and with those below as well, for the reasons stated above. The vote was more brutal than the Tory election result.

Yep think it was only us and C115y who voted for it.

We'll beat all of them so badly over the next few years they'll be desperate for it.

[Tuscans]

Aston Villa roll over their overdraft facility with Barclays. Nothing exciting to report, just a renewal @KieronMaguire

[Olneythelonely]

Hope we’ve paid ourselves a handsome amount to rent out Bodymoor Heath to Real Unión whilst we’re in America

[Brazilian Villain]

Hope we’ve paid ourselves a handsome amount to rent out Bodymoor Heath to Real Unión whilst we’re in America

I've heard Josh Feeney's and Tommi O'Reilly's tour guide rates are very expensive.

[garyellis]

Did anyone catch the discussion on TS this morning.
I caught the bit where it mentions Manure getting special concessions for Covid costs and Radcliffe investment costs.
They also mentioned us and the guy/expert reckons we will have a £100m deficit to sort out by June next year. So far we’ve found £25m from player trading
I assume this does not take account of CL money, increased gate receipts and the new adidas deal.

[Beard82]

Did anyone catch the discussion on TS this morning.
I caught the bit where it mentions Manure getting special concessions for Covid costs and Radcliffe investment costs.
They also mentioned us and the guy/expert reckons we will have a £100m deficit to sort out by June next year. So far we’ve found £25m from player trading
I assume this does not take account of CL money, increased gate receipts and the new adidas deal.

I imagine they are talking about the fact that the Grealish money will come off the rolling balance. 

[Tuscans]

Did anyone catch the discussion on TS this morning.
I caught the bit where it mentions Manure getting special concessions for Covid costs and Radcliffe investment costs.
They also mentioned us and the guy/expert reckons we will have a £100m deficit to sort out by June next year. So far we’ve found £25m from player trading
I assume this does not take account of CL money, increased gate receipts and the new adidas deal.

This is it @7:08 its very brief, about 20 seconds until they cut for the ads...

I sent him a quick question, "You say we have to find £75M in player sales next summer, is that with/without increased revenue from UECL, new sponsor and Adidas? The likely Duran and Carlos sales this window would almost cover that"?

His reply, "A very high level estimate on current sponsors and Adidas and CL. Yes Duran alone should get you in range"

[Toronto Villa]

This is the same interview as above I think but specifically the bit talking about Man U.

https://x.com/danlang12/status/1820862860005712350?s=46

[eamonn]

Fuck ManYoo

[LeonW]

Did anyone catch the discussion on TS this morning.
I caught the bit where it mentions Manure getting special concessions for Covid costs and Radcliffe investment costs.
They also mentioned us and the guy/expert reckons we will have a £100m deficit to sort out by June next year. So far we’ve found £25m from player trading
I assume this does not take account of CL money, increased gate receipts and the new adidas deal.

I heard that with interest and he seems to be pretty good on this stuff. It did get me thinking about player sales vs points deductions/penalties. I very much doubt a points deduction (based upon what we’ve seen so far) would exceed the points won by an Emi or Ollie, so take the points deduction and keep the player.