Ezri Konsa

[Drummond]

The shirt is his right now. I'm convinced of his quality and flexibility and for that reason he'll play regularly.

[Louzie0]

The shirt is his right now. I'm convinced of his quality and flexibility and for that reason he'll play regularly.

I think Tuchel’s contract to win a trophy with England within 16 months means that he will pick whoever’s good and does it for him and the team, rather than necessarily the player who’s been historically associated with the position, especially if they’ve not been there. Konsa fits that.

[Footy-Vill]

I was worried he may have got injured when he was crudely fouled one time on touch line.
Konsa was the most fouled England player against Latvia fouled 5 times.

Konsa knows how to win a foul but he was also targeted it felt with some of the fouling against him.
however it was probably because he was against low level opposition.

[dcdavecollett]

He took quite a shoeing last night.

[achilles]

Surprised nobody has mentioned Konsa’s non-existent defending for the Forest goal! He actually stood still and did nothing except take a crap, Onana was the one trying to get a tackle in! When did he stop trying to make a tackle or attacking the ball?

[Clampy]

Surprised nobody has mentioned Konsa’s non-existent defending for the Forest goal! He actually stood still and did nothing except take a crap, Onana was the one trying to get a tackle in! When did he stop trying to make a tackle or attacking the ball?

Surprised you haven't mentioned how well we are doing.

[Somniloquism]

Surprised nobody has mentioned Konsa’s non-existent defending for the Forest goal! He actually stood still and did nothing except take a crap, Onana was the one trying to get a tackle in! When did he stop trying to make a tackle or attacking the ball?

Strange take on it. You could argue a lot more defensive errors happened, but the ball was pulled back into the box a metre away and was closer to Mings, then actually went further away with Jota's touch which was the reason Onana had the chance to tackle. Then there was fractions from Konsa blocking the shot, or not even touching it and Martinez saving it.

Edit: Just had a quick look at the other posts. One of those will only ever posts negatives and disappears when good stuff is happening. So not a strange take in those circumstances.

[Olneythelonely]

I’ve not seen it back but didn’t the shot deflect off Konsa, when he was trying to get a block in?

[Somniloquism]

Yes it did. As I mention it was fractions from him not touching it and being a save, or him getting in a good block, but seeing the posters history, he was struggling to find anything negative so chose that.

[achilles]

I now understand why I rarely ever post on this forum, (discussion is banned) and will certainly refrain from in future!

By the way, I refuse to sink to your pathetic level of checking posters previous posts, how very sad!

However I do think we are doing fantastic but that is bloody obvious!

[Drummond]

I now understand why I rarely ever post on this forum, (discussion is banned) and will certainly refrain from in future!

By the way, I refuse to sink to your pathetic level of checking posters previous posts, how very sad!

However I do think we are doing fantastic but that is bloody obvious!

That's an odd take.

[Somniloquism]

I now understand why I rarely ever post on this forum, (discussion is banned) and will certainly refrain from in future!

By the way, I refuse to sink to your pathetic level of checking posters previous posts, how very sad!

However I do think we are doing fantastic but that is bloody obvious!

Well when your only post about a tremendous result against a rival is Konsa just sat their taking a shit in the box, people will think that is an odd take when we had just beaten a rival AND gone 7 on the bounce in all competitions.

Your last post against Preston was just before we scored yet nothing after the goals when we have just qualified for a Semi-final. So yes I will lump you  in with BC Villain and others who appear to just moan-post and have not one thing to say when we are doing well.

[paul_e]

Once again, because it comes up on here so often, people disagreeing with you doesn't mean you're banned from having an opinion, it means they just don't share it. If lots of people disagree all at once it's not a pile-on or bullying, it's that you've shared an opinion that lots of people disagree with.

[pauliewalnuts]

Once again, because it comes up on here so often, people disagreeing with you doesn't mean you're banned from having an opinion, it means they just don't share it. If lots of people disagree all at once it's not a pile-on or bullying, it's that you've shared an opinion that lots of people disagree with.

.. or, you're just a monumental twat we all dislike.

[Drummond]

Once again, because it comes up on here so often, people disagreeing with you doesn't mean you're banned from having an opinion, it means they just don't share it. If lots of people disagree all at once it's not a pile-on or bullying, it's that you've shared an opinion that lots of people disagree with.

.. or, you're just a monumental twat we all dislike.

At least I know the truth now.