collapse collapse

Please donate to help towards the costs of keeping this site going. Thank You.

Recent Topics

Villa Park Redevelopment by AV82EC
[Today at 12:08:27 PM]


Aston Villa v Brugge Post-Match Thread by Demitri_C
[Today at 12:03:52 PM]


Marcus Rashford - signed on loan by Demitri_C
[Today at 12:02:08 PM]


Ollie Watkins by Gareth
[Today at 11:36:10 AM]


Champions League - PSG by Duncan Shaw
[Today at 11:27:16 AM]


Leon Bailey by Hookeysmith
[Today at 11:22:37 AM]


Dubai by Dave
[Today at 11:21:21 AM]


Celebrity Fans: What's The Point? by Tony Daleys Shorts
[Today at 11:03:09 AM]

Recent Posts

Re: Villa Park Redevelopment by AV82EC
[Today at 12:08:27 PM]


Re: Villa Park Redevelopment by The Edge
[Today at 12:05:40 PM]


Re: Aston Villa v Brugge Post-Match Thread by Demitri_C
[Today at 12:03:52 PM]


Re: Marcus Rashford - signed on loan by Demitri_C
[Today at 12:02:08 PM]


Re: Marcus Rashford - signed on loan by Matt C
[Today at 11:44:30 AM]


Re: Marcus Rashford - signed on loan by OCD
[Today at 11:39:10 AM]


Re: Ollie Watkins by Gareth
[Today at 11:36:10 AM]


Re: Marcus Rashford - signed on loan by AV84
[Today at 11:27:44 AM]

Follow us on...

Author Topic: VAR  (Read 434787 times)

Offline Somniloquism

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 30194
  • Location: Back in Brum
  • GM : 06.12.2025
Re: VAR
« Reply #2865 on: August 25, 2023, 11:39:01 AM »
As if the world couldn't detest Dean any more.

It shows exactly why it shouldn't be fellow officials doing VAR.

Exactly….it’s a role in itself and shouldn’t be done amongst pals having a day off from thinking about.

Should be independent of referees

Hard to be independent of referees being as they have to interpret the same rules (albeit only a specific subset).

Malandro

  • Guest
Re: VAR
« Reply #2866 on: August 25, 2023, 12:34:41 PM »
As if the world couldn't detest Dean any more.

It shows exactly why it shouldn't be fellow officials doing VAR.

Exactly….it’s a role in itself and shouldn’t be done amongst pals having a day off from thinking about.

Should be independent of referees

Hard to be independent of referees being as they have to interpret the same rules (albeit only a specific subset).

At least Den has admitted that he’s a c**t.

Online Gareth

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 6720
  • Age: 50
  • Location: Redditch
  • GM : 25.02.2026
Re: VAR
« Reply #2867 on: August 25, 2023, 02:06:17 PM »
As if the world couldn't detest Dean any more.

It shows exactly why it shouldn't be fellow officials doing VAR.

Exactly….it’s a role in itself and shouldn’t be done amongst pals having a day off from thinking about.

Should be independent of referees

Hard to be independent of referees being as they have to interpret the same rules (albeit only a specific subset).

By independent I mean you shouldn’t be refereeing on the Saturday then be the VAR on Sunday.  It should be a specialist job…I’d go as far as to say the VAR shouldn’t be a referee because as Deans example shows they side with the on field decision too much rather than saying it’s wrong.  Similar the poxy screens don’t work either, as soon as they are sent the decision changes 90%+ of the time because they are shown a replay slowed to show what the VAR wants them to see…if they must have screens it should only show angles at real time speed.

Online Brend'Watkins

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 22698
  • Location: North Birmingham Clique teritory
  • GM : 20.03.2025
Re: VAR
« Reply #2868 on: August 25, 2023, 02:14:29 PM »
I suppose with the advancement of AI Var will in time become 100% accurate.  No doubt the ***** who run it will programme the AI to have Sky favourite bias.

Offline Somniloquism

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 30194
  • Location: Back in Brum
  • GM : 06.12.2025
Re: VAR
« Reply #2869 on: August 25, 2023, 02:49:29 PM »
By independent I mean you shouldn’t be refereeing on the Saturday then be the VAR on Sunday.  It should be a specialist job…I’d go as far as to say the VAR shouldn’t be a referee because as Deans example shows they side with the on field decision too much rather than saying it’s wrong.  Similar the poxy screens don’t work either, as soon as they are sent the decision changes 90%+ of the time because they are shown a replay slowed to show what the VAR wants them to see…if they must have screens it should only show angles at real time speed.

Of course the screen review will 90% of the time change the decision because the screen review usually means the initial decision on the field is called wrongly. If the ref states to the VAR operator that he didn't think it was a penalty because he didn't see contact, and then VAR has an angle that shows the contact, the ref will have to review to see if they believed it was enough to overrule his initial judgement. In most cases it is and slow-mo or not won't really make any difference. It is why if the ref states there was contact, but not enough in their view to class as a penalty, VAR rarely calls the ref over to the screen because any contact would be according to the on-field call.

In my view these are the ones where the ref could always have requested they want to re-look at that themselves. That is where VAR should have been useful, however due to the "delays" and other reasons, a ref won't go to the monitor to voluntarily double check their decision making.

Offline pablo_picasso

  • Member
  • Posts: 3776
  • GM : 17.11.2024
Re: VAR
« Reply #2870 on: August 25, 2023, 03:00:08 PM »
As if the world couldn't detest Dean any more.

It shows exactly why it shouldn't be fellow officials doing VAR.

Exactly….it’s a role in itself and shouldn’t be done amongst pals having a day off from thinking about.

Should be independent of referees

Hard to be independent of referees being as they have to interpret the same rules (albeit only a specific subset).

The fact that they have to "interpret' the written down laws, rules & regulations of the game is the biggest problem from the get go.

Rules & regulations should not be subjective or have to be interpreted.

They should be simple to understand & be able to administer for both players & officials.

Because its not as if footballers are the brightest bunch on the planet.

They need a fucking law degree to be able to understand the convoluted & overly complicated rules that are currently in place...

Offline N'ZMAV

  • Member
  • Posts: 9948
  • Location: Peckham
Re: VAR
« Reply #2871 on: August 25, 2023, 03:03:24 PM »
Mike Dean - what a fucking worm.

A huge problem over the last decade or so has been this incompetant mans influence on too many matches. What a prick.

Offline paul_e

  • Member
  • Posts: 36156
  • Age: 45
  • GM : July, 2013
Re: VAR
« Reply #2872 on: August 25, 2023, 03:05:21 PM »
As I've said many times the best change that could come to VAR is to make the audio available.

The system works in Rugby and Cricket because, if you want to, you can hear the conversation between the on-field official and the TV ref. It wouldn't fix the specific issue that Dean raised there (which is gross negligence and not a VAR specific problem) but it would remove a lot of the problems.

How you play that out in the ground is more difficult but the little radios work reasonably well for the cricket and rugby so probably copy them there as well.

What the existence of VAR does do though is acknowledge that the rules (or more accurately how they're used) at the very highest level of sport has to be different to park matches. Trying to continue with the "it's the same game at every level" thing was commendable but hasn't really made worked since the amount of footage available and the money involved went through the roof in the early 90s.

Offline villadelph

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 5875
  • | UTV | 215 |
  • GM : 20.05.2025
Re: VAR
« Reply #2873 on: August 25, 2023, 03:09:48 PM »
Mike Dean - what a fucking worm.

A huge problem over the last decade or so has been this incompetant mans influence on too many matches. What a prick.

An arrogant worm at that. Some people aren't bothered by this but I, while not shocked, am extremely angry at the revelations and his hubris to admit it. Disgusting.

Offline dave shelley

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 15863
  • Age: 76
  • Location: between a rock and a hard place
  • GM : 01.02.2026
Re: VAR
« Reply #2874 on: August 25, 2023, 05:56:43 PM »
He should be horse whipped.  He gives the rest of us a bad name as if we don't have a bad enough one as it is.
« Last Edit: August 25, 2023, 05:58:55 PM by dave shelley »

Offline aj2k77

  • Member
  • Posts: 11366
Re: VAR
« Reply #2875 on: August 25, 2023, 06:05:22 PM »
He was an absolutely shit refereee aswell. ''Top 6'' Fawning twat.

Offline LeonW

  • Member
  • Posts: 1879
Re: VAR
« Reply #2876 on: August 25, 2023, 06:16:09 PM »
As I've said many times the best change that could come to VAR is to make the audio available.

The system works in Rugby and Cricket because, if you want to, you can hear the conversation between the on-field official and the TV ref. It wouldn't fix the specific issue that Dean raised there (which is gross negligence and not a VAR specific problem) but it would remove a lot of the problems.

How you play that out in the ground is more difficult but the little radios work reasonably well for the cricket and rugby so probably copy them there as well.

What the existence of VAR does do though is acknowledge that the rules (or more accurately how they're used) at the very highest level of sport has to be different to park matches. Trying to continue with the "it's the same game at every level" thing was commendable but hasn't really made worked since the amount of footage available and the money involved went through the roof in the early 90s.

I don’t think they’ll ever have the VAR audio available in real time because it will confirm what we all know and what Dean admitted to recently.

Offline paul_e

  • Member
  • Posts: 36156
  • Age: 45
  • GM : July, 2013
Re: VAR
« Reply #2877 on: August 25, 2023, 07:28:07 PM »
As I've said many times the best change that could come to VAR is to make the audio available.

The system works in Rugby and Cricket because, if you want to, you can hear the conversation between the on-field official and the TV ref. It wouldn't fix the specific issue that Dean raised there (which is gross negligence and not a VAR specific problem) but it would remove a lot of the problems.

How you play that out in the ground is more difficult but the little radios work reasonably well for the cricket and rugby so probably copy them there as well.

What the existence of VAR does do though is acknowledge that the rules (or more accurately how they're used) at the very highest level of sport has to be different to park matches. Trying to continue with the "it's the same game at every level" thing was commendable but hasn't really made worked since the amount of footage available and the money involved went through the roof in the early 90s.

I don’t think they’ll ever have the VAR audio available in real time because it will confirm what we all know and what Dean admitted to recently.

Which is exactly why we need it and why people should push for it.

Online Gareth

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 6720
  • Age: 50
  • Location: Redditch
  • GM : 25.02.2026
Re: VAR
« Reply #2878 on: August 25, 2023, 07:29:34 PM »
I suppose with the advancement of AI Var will in time become 100% accurate.  No doubt the ***** who run it will programme the AI to have Sky favourite bias.

Thought that was a new Saudi club for a minute :-)

Offline villadelph

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 5875
  • | UTV | 215 |
  • GM : 20.05.2025
Re: VAR
« Reply #2879 on: August 25, 2023, 08:08:58 PM »
Wenger was fined 40k and given a three match ban for calling Dean dishonest to his face.

Give that man his money back, with interest.

 


SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal