Quote from: Drummond on August 25, 2023, 09:44:36 AMAs if the world couldn't detest Dean any more.It shows exactly why it shouldn't be fellow officials doing VAR.Exactly….it’s a role in itself and shouldn’t be done amongst pals having a day off from thinking about.Should be independent of referees
As if the world couldn't detest Dean any more.It shows exactly why it shouldn't be fellow officials doing VAR.
Quote from: Gareth on August 25, 2023, 09:58:59 AMQuote from: Drummond on August 25, 2023, 09:44:36 AMAs if the world couldn't detest Dean any more.It shows exactly why it shouldn't be fellow officials doing VAR.Exactly….it’s a role in itself and shouldn’t be done amongst pals having a day off from thinking about.Should be independent of refereesHard to be independent of referees being as they have to interpret the same rules (albeit only a specific subset).
By independent I mean you shouldn’t be refereeing on the Saturday then be the VAR on Sunday. It should be a specialist job…I’d go as far as to say the VAR shouldn’t be a referee because as Deans example shows they side with the on field decision too much rather than saying it’s wrong. Similar the poxy screens don’t work either, as soon as they are sent the decision changes 90%+ of the time because they are shown a replay slowed to show what the VAR wants them to see…if they must have screens it should only show angles at real time speed.
Mike Dean - what a fucking worm. A huge problem over the last decade or so has been this incompetant mans influence on too many matches. What a prick.
As I've said many times the best change that could come to VAR is to make the audio available.The system works in Rugby and Cricket because, if you want to, you can hear the conversation between the on-field official and the TV ref. It wouldn't fix the specific issue that Dean raised there (which is gross negligence and not a VAR specific problem) but it would remove a lot of the problems.How you play that out in the ground is more difficult but the little radios work reasonably well for the cricket and rugby so probably copy them there as well.What the existence of VAR does do though is acknowledge that the rules (or more accurately how they're used) at the very highest level of sport has to be different to park matches. Trying to continue with the "it's the same game at every level" thing was commendable but hasn't really made worked since the amount of footage available and the money involved went through the roof in the early 90s.
Quote from: paul_e on August 25, 2023, 03:05:21 PMAs I've said many times the best change that could come to VAR is to make the audio available.The system works in Rugby and Cricket because, if you want to, you can hear the conversation between the on-field official and the TV ref. It wouldn't fix the specific issue that Dean raised there (which is gross negligence and not a VAR specific problem) but it would remove a lot of the problems.How you play that out in the ground is more difficult but the little radios work reasonably well for the cricket and rugby so probably copy them there as well.What the existence of VAR does do though is acknowledge that the rules (or more accurately how they're used) at the very highest level of sport has to be different to park matches. Trying to continue with the "it's the same game at every level" thing was commendable but hasn't really made worked since the amount of footage available and the money involved went through the roof in the early 90s.I don’t think they’ll ever have the VAR audio available in real time because it will confirm what we all know and what Dean admitted to recently.
I suppose with the advancement of AI Var will in time become 100% accurate. No doubt the ***** who run it will programme the AI to have Sky favourite bias.